This tutorial will show you a quick and dirty way to isolate an image on a white background. This method is fast and looks fine for web graphics, but I wouldn’t recommend it for anything hi-res.

Let’s get started shall we?

So you start off with your image on a white background, in this case it’s a blue piece of luggage on a white background that I want to drop onto a yellow background.

So I drag the image of the luggage onto my new orange background. At this point I can choose to use a selection mask to carefully select around the perimeter of the luggage, or I can use the lasso tool to do the same. Some might even suggest using the eraser tool instead. Those are all great methods that I use often in large files, but in this case I’m going to cheat a little.

Rather than following any of the “correct” methods I mentioned, I’m simply going to set the layer’s blending properties to “Multiply” which makes anything white transparent. Obviously that looks like crap, but there’s more!

Now I make a new layer underneath the luggage layer. In this layer I will use a brush to color in behind the luggage with white. The white layer on top of the color layer blocks your background color from showing through your image.

To make straight lines I click, hold down shift and click again and a line will be drawn between the two points. I fill in the edges using this method then scribble in the rest. The benefit to this method is if you make a mistake you can easily erase the bottom layer without altering your original image. It’s also less precise than using selection masks and can be done in less than a minute with a tablet or even a mouse and you don’t have to look at any weird red overlays. With practice this can be done in a few seconds.

Another great befit to this method is any shadows you end up with look natural against any background since they don’t contain any of that left over white color. As you can see in the example above the shadow on the left using the Multiply method looks much more natural and less choppy.

This method doesn’t have the kind of accuracy that’s necessary for print, but it works just find in a small scale web graphic when you’re pressed for time.

If you have a method that works great for you, please share it in the comments.

Animated Banners

See all 15 Halloween Masks at Costume Pop

After hearing the news that Ralph Lauren doesn’t feed their models I had to try to imagine what this woman must have looked like before they butchered her—I imagine that she was probably once quite beautiful. This is just a quick edit to demonstrate what normal human anatomy sort of looks like.

Don’t get me wrong, I love photomanip… I edit photos professionally and for fun, but within reason. It’s important to use a light touch to make someone look their best and really bring out the features that give them character. One photo could never catch the essence of something or someone entirely and I feel that editing helps the viewer see what you want them to. But this is downright disgusting… but more importantly it’s inaccurate. I’ll never claim to be an anatomy expert, but I do feel that good Photoshop artists must have a basic understanding of human anatomy… otherwise they do things like crush someone’s rib cage or remove their vital organs.

I honestly don’t know if this is the result of a lack of understanding of the human body or an obsession with portraying it as disfigured. What do you think?